Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Popular Discussions - SAP APO - Production Planning, Interfaces and Global ATP
Viewing all 953 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Ruled based ATP and Checking horizon

April 28, 2014, 8:00 pm
$
0
0

Hi Experts

I have one issues

when I activate the RULE based ATP in the checking instruction and it works well, but the system can not use the checking horizon function, this will cause if there is no enough stock in the triggering plant and substitution plant, the system can not confirm all requirement.

I want the system works like this
1. first check  stock in the triggering plant and substitution plant , if the substitution plant has a stock the system will generate a STO order

2. if there is not enough stock in triggering plant and substitution plant, the system will confirm the remaining requirement in the triggering plant using check horizon.

how to do  that?

does anyone have encounter this issue?

by the way, I have tried if I activate the RBA in the checking instruction and checking horizon in the check control, the RBA will not work, the system will only confirm the trigger plant stock , even if the substitution plant have enough stock , the system will ignore them.

if I only activate the RBA, the check horizon can not not be used.

I want to use both.

thank you in advance!

↧
Search

MTO FG used as a Component of another MTO FG

February 23, 2015, 2:12 am
$
0
0

Hi experts,

 

In our project, we are using MTO scenario. There are certain MTO finished goods (COMP MTO FG) used as components of another MTO finished good (HEADER MTO FG).

When we place sales order for the COMP MTO FG directly , we want to plan that in MTO segment. However, when the dependent demand is coming from the HEADER MTO FG, we want to plan them in MTS segment.

 

In ECC, there is an option in BOM - to use an explosion type to decide how the demand should be planned - individually or collectively. Basically an option to override the Material master MRP 4 'Indi/Colle. indicator setting'.

 

However the above explosion type cannot be transferred to APO PDS in standard. So, we could not achieve our requirement with the above option.

 

Could you please let us know if there are any other standard or custom options to achieve this in APO?

 

Please let me know if you need any more details.

 

Regards,

Manimaran M.

↧
↧

APO GATP ISSUE

February 17, 2015, 9:34 pm
$
0
0

Hi Guru's,

 

When Sales order is raised its not showing me APO Screen.I am getting below Error provided in the screen Could  anyone Guide me on this.

Capture.PNG

 

 

 

Thanks

Ganesh

↧

Table Mapping in SAP ECC & SAP APO

February 24, 2015, 10:03 pm
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

We transfer an object  (ex: Material) from ECC to APO, so many fields from different tables of ECC get transferred to APO using CIF. These fields are stored in APO tables. Can I get mapping of fields of tables of ECC to fields of tables of APO.

 

I need field table mapping of ECC and APO.

 

Please help.

↧

Debugging CIF -BADI -/SAPAPO/CURTO

February 8, 2011, 9:32 pm
$
0
0

I was trying to debug the CIF and put a break point in the method CIF_IMPORT but it is not stopping at my break point.I am very new to APO and this is kind of first object i am working on. Here is the steps i did so far.

 

1. Create implementation to BADI   /SAPAPO/CURTO

2. In method CIF_IMPORT, i put a break point.

 

Now i turned on the debugging mode by doing the below setps.

1.In SAP ECC,  CFC2 - switched on the debugging

2. In APO, /SAPAPO/C4 - switched on Debugger

 

From ECC ( CFm1/CFm2), I transferred the data trhrough CIF and i am seeing the entry Queue in SMQ2 in APO.The status is NOEXEC. When i double click on that line, it is calling Function module : /SAPAPO/CIF_GEN_EVENT.

When i click on LUW for debugging, it is going through the SAP code but does not call my BADI implementation and even does not stop at the break point in my method.

Could anyone tell me what was wrong.

 

Thanks a Bunch.

Sunitha.

↧
↧

BOP is pushing incomplete orders

February 24, 2015, 12:53 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

BOP is pushing the incomplete orders, is it standard process?

i want to stop the incomplete orders, i want to send clean orders only.

Please suggest.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Vasu.

↧

Use of the transaction code SAPAPO/RRP3

March 27, 2012, 2:28 am
$
0
0

     Hello,

Please let me know the purpose of the transaction code /n/sapapo/rrp3?

Can we change the confirmed quantity of the sales order in this transaction code under "ATP" tab?

thanks in advance for your help.

 

B Regards,

Bhaskar.K

↧

FM for pegging relationship

April 29, 2011, 12:23 pm
$
0
0

Hello all,

 

We need to develop a customized report in APO that shows the demand element with pegging relationships with a production order.

In our business scenario, the sales orders are created in a location type distribution center and planned and production orders are created in a location type production plant. To do this, the MRP heuristics create purchase requisition to request the material from production plant to distribution center.

So, our intention is to find a sales order in the distribution center u201Cpeggedu201D to the production order in the production plant.

This information is similar to the data showed by the Order Context function of transaction /SAPAPO/RRP3.

 

We have developed a Z Function that uses BAPIs below:

 

BAPI_MOSRVAPS_GETLIST2 u2013 to get pegging data in table  PEGGING_OUTPUT_NODES

BAPI_POSRVAPS_GETLIST3 u2013 to get pegging data of purchase requisition

BAPI_SLSRVAPS_GETLIST2 u2013 to finally get sales order information

 

The logic is more complex when we have dependent demand, because we have to call the BAPI_MOSRVAPS_GETLIST2 more than once until find the related purchase requisition.

 

The Z Function works fine but the performance is very poor mainly because we have different location.

 

Our question: is there a standard function module that shows the pegging relationship across the entire chain?

 

We have also tried the EFPL_ORD_NET_GET but we were not able to find which parameters should we use and how to input it correctly . We didnu2019t find documentation about it.

 

Can you help us?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Januario Faria

↧
Search

APO: Order XXXX Does not exist after STO Delivery is Deleted

August 8, 2014, 6:05 pm
$
0
0

Issue : When Delivery of Stock Transfer Order (PO) is deleted and we try to Create New Delivery; we get this Error APO: Order XXXX Does not exist.  When we go to Stock Transfer Order (PO) and try to do availability check on the order, we get same error APO: Order XXXX Does not exist.


Steps to Re-create:


1. Create Stock Transfer Order and Save

2. Create Delivery Note

3. Delete Delivery Note

4. Try to Create Delivery Note again  -> Error APO: Order XXXX Does not exist.

5. Try to Do ATP Check on Order Again - > Error APO: Order XXXX Does not exist.


Additional Information


1.  Order was present in /SAPAPO/POSMAPN All the time after Creation and deletion of Delivery Note.

2. When CIF Reconciliation was run, I got Schedule Line 1 missing Purchase Orders and Schedule line missing for Confirmation. Which explain why the ATP Check is not done on order ( or Error: Order is not Present in APO)


Question: We run CIF Reconciliation once a day and Clear all the Errors once a day. Delivery Deletion is common Scenario and we did not face this issue while recreating Delivery before EHP 6.0 Upgrade.  Why after Delivery is deleted, Order Details Cease to exist in APO and How can i resolve this issue?

↧
↧

Issue with Purc.Req

February 8, 2015, 10:55 pm
$
0
0

HI,

 

I am facing an issue in generating Purchase Requisition. Once I confirm the sales order I go to rrp3 and run the product heuristic. A Purch Req is getting generated. But it does not have a number and it is also not reflecting in document flow of Sales order. Kindly help me with this.

 

Thanks

↧

Propagation Range invalid when executing heuristic parallel

February 26, 2015, 1:26 am
$
0
0

Hi all,

 

I execute a custom heuristic with certain propagation range.

When I execute it for every resource in a several task (CALL FUNCTION STARTING NEW TAST) the LC scheduler provides RC 102:

Invalid propagation range for deletion or changing

 

But when I execute the heursitic in the planning run the result is fine, so the propagation range in the variant seems to be okay.

When I execute it parallel with prop. range SAPALL it's okay too.

 

Did anyone ever notice such a behaviour?

Why would the LC not be able to handle prop. ranges in new tasks?

 

Thank you for any answer!

 

Best regards,

Florian von der Weth

↧

PR should generate in the first day of the week

February 18, 2015, 11:32 pm
$
0
0


Hi,

 

In product planning table (/SAPAPO/PPT1) in APO, against requirement PR (Purchase requisition) for externally procured material is created on weekly basis. The view is weekly.

 

In ECC the delivery/ requirement dats of the component is coming in last day of the week for the PR.

 

The requirement is to get the requirement/ delivery date of the PR in the first day of the week.

 

We are usining standard lot size (EX).

I tried with weekly lot size with delivery/ requirement on first half of the period (week). But this is not working.

 

How to achieve the same?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Regards,

Surajit Das

↧

GATP and AFS compatibility

February 25, 2015, 8:09 pm
$
0
0

Hi

 

Has anyone been able to enable GATP for AFS materials? Is there anything that would prevent ATP check happening in APO for AFS materials? Any information greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks

↧
↧

Heuristic error, PR number not visible in RR3

February 26, 2015, 11:17 pm
$
0
0

Hi All

 

 

First Thanking all for your continuous support for your valuable comments.

 

Today I faced a strange in RRP3, Purchase requisition number not coming even though heuristic completed. But same case working in quality environment. Please find the below screen shot for reference.

pr issue1.JPG

 

I ran all the consistency checks,cleared all queues,CCR,CPP,/sapapo/sdrqcr21 etc. Still number not comming to RRP3.

 

would like to what would be root cause for this, how can fix this type of issue, Please comment and provide your valuable solutions.

 

 

Thanks

Sudhakar

↧

atp group

February 24, 2015, 11:21 pm
$
0
0


Dear Expert

In material master i have specifed ATP group as daily  requirement and have triggered gatp for that material
it is not generating planned orders .but when i select as individual requirement gatp is triggering planned
order are generating what could be reason


Regards
virender

↧
Search

SAP GATP Order confirmation

March 3, 2015, 3:52 am
$
0
0

Hi

 

Today we received a different requirement from client. Please find the below jist of the requirement and provide your comments.

 

  • Client don't want APO sale order confirmation for some particular customers, but material belongs to APO related.

 

How we can skip APO confirmation to the above case.

 

Input: Sale Order

Output: Unconfirmed sale order.

 

 

Regards

Sudhakar

↧

Can pegging to SAP orders broken in PP/DS?

March 3, 2015, 4:01 pm
$
0
0

    Gurus,

We are implementing CTP with Block planning but have run into this issue. If there is an SNP order from Forecast the system pegs the sale order to an SNP Pl Order and gives a date which is not based on Blocks. Is there any way that we can tell the system not to peg SNP orders selectively?

Thanks,

Subash

↧
↧

STO lines are Stuck in LiveCache or APO and we cannot ship future lines

February 13, 2015, 10:01 am
$
0
0

Hello experts I have a problem with multiple STO confirmations (ConRels)  showing up and taking availability away from current items even though the PO line is fully delivered , Marked Final Delivery and Deliv. Compl. flags are checked.  They do not show up in the ordering plant just the manufacturing side as ConRel with confirmed quantities.  (See Attached Images  plant 1000 is the ordering plant , 6110 the MFG plant)

 

CCR delta report does not see them.

 

I tried deleting the line in the PO and that did not work.  I ran /SAPAPO/SDORDER_DEL and it does not find them. OM17 reports no discrepancies.

 

It is hampering the ability to ship on current lines from the factory. Any advice will be appreciated.

↧

Running Backorder processing (/SAPAPO/BOP) but it is not generating TQAs

March 3, 2015, 7:45 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I am running BOP, I do see that once BOP job is complete, CIF queues get created.

I can see sales order CIF queues in ECC I/B ( I have blocked ECC I/B to check the queue content), but I observed that there are no TQAs in /SAPAPO/AC06 for my BOP.

 

I know when BOP runs it creates TQAs, then queues are sent over to ECC, once sales orders are updated queues come back to APO and update APO database and delete the TQAs. In the scenario I have mentioned my CIF queues are not yet processed and they are present in ECC I/B but still I don't see TQAs in APO.

 

Can anyone help me if they faced similar situation in the past, or if there is any setting which I might be missing.

 

Appreciate your help.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Anupam

↧

decimals APO a.check screen for PO

March 3, 2015, 8:39 pm
$
0
0

Hi

 

When I create the PO (ME21N) the APO availability screen showing decimals if the quantities are in single digits.

How I can restrict the decimals for the PO. Could some please help How to restrict the decimals for PO like sales order below.

I do not want decimals in the APO availability check screen.

 

Below I have created the PO for the qty 5 but the system is showing 5.000. I want to remove .000.

If the PO qty is 5 then APO availability check screen should populate only 5. No decimals like 5.000.

Please help.

 

 

 

When I create the sales order  the APO availability screen showing single digits. No decimals for sales order.

 

Thanks,

↧
Viewing all 953 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>