Hi,
I have a situation where in the users manually change the SNP Planned orders(keeping the overall amount as constant) in the planning book. Post that when these orders are converted into PP/DS orders some of the orders are lost.
Can you suggest some solution for this behavior.
Thanks
What is the full from of HALB(semi-finished) & FERT(finished) ?
Hi Team,
I am trying to perform a GATP check on a line item for a Sales Order from the R3 system. When I select the line item of the Sales Order and click on the "Availability screen" i.e. on the weights symbol, the control is not going to the APO system from the R3 system and am unable to see the ATP results screen of APO. The material is made as ATP relevant and hence the ATP check has to take place in APO. In my case, I am not getting this desired screen.
Please help me regarding this issue.
Thanks in advance for the help and for your time.
Thanks & Regards,
Srikanth.
Hi Experts,
Can you please help me how to we know order priority in GATP.
My question is " GATP SHOULD NOT ALLOCATE STOCK TO A LOWER PRIORITY ORDER IF A HIGH PRIORITY ORDER CAN NOT BE FULFILLED"
Please help me out How to check in GATP and how make it in the system.
This is great help for me.
Thanks & Regards,
vasu.
Hello Team,
Need expert opinion on below issues.
When Storage exclusion Indicator is set in MM02-MRP4 view & storage location ATP check is active, ATP check in ECC and APO are behaving different.
In ECC, When you check this indicator - stock in the storage location is excluded from MRP and ATP check. When (no storage location is specified in sales order) in ECC. When you specify storage location in sales order, stock in storage location is considered to give confirmation. Same does not happen in case of GATP check.
GATP does not exclude the storage location stock for the indicator set, automatically, We need to implement user exit for excluding stock from GATP by deleting in CIF or changing the ATP category.
1798831 - Global ATP considers storage locations excluded from MRP
I have created ZC category for such stocks and it is not part of scope of check. When excluded storage location is not mentioned, it works fine, when excluded storage location is mentioned in sales order, it does not give confirmation. As all stock has been moved to ZC category which is not part of scope of check.
Ex :
MAT1 - in Plant P1-SL1 = 5
in Plant P1-SL2 = 10
in Plant P1-SL3 = 8 - Indicator set
in ECC
Sales ord - MAT1 PL1 = Confirmation is for 15
Sales ord - MAT1 PL1 - SL1 = Confirmation is for 5
Sales ord - MAT1 PL1 - SL3 = Confirmation is for 8
in APO-GATP
Sales ord - MAT1 PL1 = Confirmation is for 15
Sales ord - MAT1 PL1 - SL1 = Confirmation is for 5
Sales ord - MAT1 PL1 - SL3 = Confirmation is for 0 ( that is the difference)
All ideas are welcome to get similar results!! 
Regards,
Dinesh Goyal
What is the full from of HALB(semi-finished) & FERT(finished) ?
Hi Experts,
Say for example I have 100 products in ECC. 50 products I want to do availability check in gATP & remaining 50 material I would like to do availability check in ECC itself. To differentiate the material between ECC and APO I have maintained MRP type 'PD' in MM for the products which need to do the availability check in ECC and 'X0' maintained for the products which need to do the availability check in gATP.
The question arises - Can I use the only one Scope of check (check control in APO)/Availability check in MM for the both the PD (products which need to do availability check in ECC), X0 - product which need to do availability check in gATP.
say for example -
for some product availability check 01 which need to check availability in ECC and gATP
for some product availability check 02 which need to check availability in ECC and gATP.
Can I use above check control/scope of check for the products which need to do availability check in ECC and as well in gATP. But MRP types are different to each other. PD is referrers to ECC material and X0 referrers to APO material.
Thanks,..
Dear All,
Our company has selected to revamp the supply chain and implement the theory of constraints the concept introduced by Edi goldratt. As you all might be aware , TOC for operations include drum buffer rope method, and identifying the constraints on the process.
We do have APO in our landscape and this has been used in a traditional forecast model and scheduling for the operations. In this connection, I would like to know did any one use SAP APO to achive the TOC.
Regards,
Krishna
Hi Experts,
BOP - delivery priority in customer master-
I have the delivery priority is - blank/00 - normal customer/low customer (as business point of view)
and delivery priority 01 is the high priority customer (as business point of view)
customer X - has delivery priority 00/blank
Customer Y - has delivery priority 01 - high priority.
I have stock 100 qty
First - customer X placed the order for the qty 100 - system confirmed
Second - customer Y placed the order for the qty 100 - system not confirmed.
How the system priorities to the customer Y- first & cancel the confirmation qty to the customer X by BOP process.
It is not working.. any idea. Please help.
Dear Expert
i want to know about checking horizon generally we mantained as 1 what does it mean .Is it related with requested delivery date little bit confuse
Example: I have product A whose sales order is created at 2nd october and requested date is 5th october which is proposed by system which is alrady defined I have block fom 8th october to 10 th october where orders sit in that block.
why system takes 10 th october .why not 8th october ?
.How it is calculation are done always it starts with end date of block . ?
In these scenerio where checking horizon plays role which is defined as one ?
3 different questions
Hi Experts - Can you just help in this test scenario.
Customer X has delivery priority 2 (low)
Customer Y has delivery priority 1 (high)
Available inventory 100 qty on product Z
Customer X place an order on Monday for delivery of 100 pcs product Z on Friday - order confirmed
Customer Y place an order on Tuesday for delivery of 100 pcs product Z on Monday - order not confirmed
There is no more stock available for product Z when Customer Y placed the order.
Now I have gone to BOP transaction /SAPAPO/BOP - Batch Backorder Processing
Then executed
Result – is as expected
The system has confirmed the qty to customer Y and canceled the qty to customer X with BOP execution.
To retest again – Just I came back from the transaction /SAPAPO/BOP. Then changed the delivery priority as Vis versa.
Say for example—
Customer Y – delivery priority – 02
Customer X – delivery priority -01
Then gone to the transaction /SAPAPO/BOP but the results are same when I executed the BOP. No change in the results with previous one
The system should confirm the qty to the customer X and should cancel the qty to the customer Y when there is a change occurs in the customer priority.
I have executed in the simulation mode – can you please just help why the system is not giving good result when we change the delivery priority to customer once BOP is executed.
What is the full from of HALB(semi-finished) & FERT(finished) ?
Hello,
we have following issue:
one product can be produced on two machines (tank resources):
Machine A1 has max. capacity of producing 329,6 Kg
Machine A2 has max. capacity of producing 438,7 Kg
Now the production would like to have a seting that would impact the order qty when creating planned orders in APO PPDS,
so that the order quantity would always be equal to the max. capacity of a given machine.
similar to functionality of lot-size qty parameters in material master data, like rounding value or minimum lot-size.
In this case I of course cannot define the lot size in the material master to meet the requirement caouse the machines have different max. capacities.
But I wander if there is a possibility to find a solution for this requirement.
We use SAP PP-Pi 6.0 and APO 7.03
would appreciate any hints!
thanks!
best regards,
Pilvi
I
Hi All,
Our products are configurable & we use class 400 on products in APO (SCM7.0). For a certain form of Products, it is possible we have atleast 4 different values to a characteristic called "XYZ". The values for this characteristic would be pre-defined as 1, 2, 3 & 4 & each Planned/Production Order will carry only 1 of these four values.. What we want is to be able to clearly identify Planned & Production Orders, by unique color coding, based on their respective values, on the DS Planning board.
Say, all Orders with char value "1" - Offwhite, those with "2" - Green & so on. We need to group such orders & sequence 'em in APO by the like characteristic values.
While I know the Planning Board profile offers config to set color coding based on orders, was wondering if I would have to use an enhancement to leverage this functionality to work for me, by characteristic value/s.
Any idea?
Thanks
Dear All,
Our company has selected to revamp the supply chain and implement the theory of constraints the concept introduced by Edi goldratt. As you all might be aware , TOC for operations include drum buffer rope method, and identifying the constraints on the process.
We do have APO in our landscape and this has been used in a traditional forecast model and scheduling for the operations. In this connection, I would like to know did any one use SAP APO to achive the TOC.
Regards,
Krishna
Hi Gurus,
We are the initial ppds implementation phase , what are the initial configuration values needed to implement PPDS and SNP? Please it will be really great help
Do i need to get any thing from Business?
Thanks & Regards,
Kumar
Dear all
We have the following scenario. In ECC each purchase requisition will be blocked, and must be approved by Purchasing. Then Purchasing department will approve the purchase requisition and convert into a purchase order.
However, in APO we want to exclude these blocked purchase requisition from GATP. Please let me know if this is possible, and if so please explain how this can be accomplished.
Hi Experts,
How can I check the availability check for purchase requisition (ME51N) in gATP.
Can anyone please help me what are all the settings required to do availability check in gATP for purchase requisition.
I know the settings how to do for the purchase order availability check in APO but not sure what settings are required to do availability check in gATP for purchase requisition.
Please..
Thanks..
Hi Experts,
Can you please help me how to we know order priority in GATP.
My question is " GATP SHOULD NOT ALLOCATE STOCK TO A LOWER PRIORITY ORDER IF A HIGH PRIORITY ORDER CAN NOT BE FULFILLED"
Please help me out How to check in GATP and how make it in the system.
This is great help for me.
Thanks & Regards,
vasu.
Hi Experts - Can you just help in this test scenario.
Customer X has delivery priority 2 (low)
Customer Y has delivery priority 1 (high)
Available inventory 100 qty on product Z
Customer X place an order on Monday for delivery of 100 pcs product Z on Friday - order confirmed
Customer Y place an order on Tuesday for delivery of 100 pcs product Z on Monday - order not confirmed
There is no more stock available for product Z when Customer Y placed the order.
Now I have gone to BOP transaction /SAPAPO/BOP - Batch Backorder Processing
Then executed
Result – is as expected
The system has confirmed the qty to customer Y and canceled the qty to customer X with BOP execution.
To retest again – Just I came back from the transaction /SAPAPO/BOP. Then changed the delivery priority as Vis versa.
Say for example—
Customer Y – delivery priority – 02
Customer X – delivery priority -01
Then gone to the transaction /SAPAPO/BOP but the results are same when I executed the BOP. No change in the results with previous one
The system should confirm the qty to the customer X and should cancel the qty to the customer Y when there is a change occurs in the customer priority.
I have executed in the simulation mode – can you please just help why the system is not giving good result when we change the delivery priority to customer once BOP is executed.
